***Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion***
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Yeah, was thinking a release once a month and an end of year compilation. That would be cool. It would also be class if there were remixes that were kept in-house, like member collabs.
Just wondering how the release schedule would be worked out, as in how the sequence is worked? ..
Just wondering how the release schedule would be worked out, as in how the sequence is worked? ..
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
we could make CD's / USB with T-shirts and calco's of the label
we speak of art with flaming passion
then do work void of compassion
and wonder why reality is bleeding fiction
then do work void of compassion
and wonder why reality is bleeding fiction
- TheBinaryMind
- pregnant
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:35 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Do it. I'm with a digital distributor for my label and they're quite OK (digdis). Only 1 euro per track for an ISRC code and your release is scattered all over the world. I'm in love with vinyl, but because of the costs (I like the crowdfunding idea btw) a Bandcamp exclusive release via branded USB stick could be more interesting, as DJ's can stick it right up their...CDJ's
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Definatly a great thing, and totally makes sense for this forum here. I like the no genre restrictions thingy, this way it can reflect the diversity of this community.
Format wise, I'd think digital is fine. We can always do some special editions on Vinyl/USB/CD/Tape/Floppy Disk/Whatever/- The more important question is the frequency and size of the release. I wouldn't do every month a release, seems too frequent. Something like every 3 months would make more sense to me. The next question then is, do we want to do EP format with 3-4 Tracks or bigger releases? Bigger releases might be cool to involve the community a bit more, maybe with 6 Original tracks and 3 remixes from forum members or something along those lines.
Format wise, I'd think digital is fine. We can always do some special editions on Vinyl/USB/CD/Tape/Floppy Disk/Whatever/- The more important question is the frequency and size of the release. I wouldn't do every month a release, seems too frequent. Something like every 3 months would make more sense to me. The next question then is, do we want to do EP format with 3-4 Tracks or bigger releases? Bigger releases might be cool to involve the community a bit more, maybe with 6 Original tracks and 3 remixes from forum members or something along those lines.
- Lost to the Void
- subsekt
- Posts: 13520
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 1:31 pm
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
No multiple remixes I say (bit of a buttport techno cliche)
Minimum 6 releases per year.
No compilations.
Ep's or mini albums.
Focus on showcasing the artist.
I'm inclined to say no remixes at all, or Artist release followed a month later by Subsekt community remix EP, competition for best/most interesting remixes, keep it down to 4 remixes.
Minimum 6 releases per year.
No compilations.
Ep's or mini albums.
Focus on showcasing the artist.
I'm inclined to say no remixes at all, or Artist release followed a month later by Subsekt community remix EP, competition for best/most interesting remixes, keep it down to 4 remixes.
- Lost to the Void
- subsekt
- Posts: 13520
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 1:31 pm
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
I'm not against vinyl, but I think we should think very carefully before doing it, as it is a dead medium and is a money pit with no breakeven, at least it shouldn't be the main outlet for the label if we decide to go there.
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Btw just my personal opinion but I think 6 releases a year is already enough. In any case, there needs to be a hard limit to the number of releases a year and someone that has the authority to say no, otherwise my experience with these things is that everyone wants to have a go and if nobody says no, that's how these buttport labels with a new release every week happen. In that sense vinyl has the obvious advantage that there's a hard limit to many you can pump out and if there's money on the line, people will take quality control more seriously.
Maybe tapes? Not a huge financial investment and can be made in small numbers and on demand if there's need for more. I think they'd also be cool because they signal that it's not a DJ-tool label, probably resulting in less standard techno submission and more variety.
Maybe tapes? Not a huge financial investment and can be made in small numbers and on demand if there's need for more. I think they'd also be cool because they signal that it's not a DJ-tool label, probably resulting in less standard techno submission and more variety.
- Lost to the Void
- subsekt
- Posts: 13520
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 1:31 pm
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Format will have absolutely no deciding on the quality control of the Subsekt label. We will keep standard high as a basic rule of the label.dubdub wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 5:47 pmBtw just my personal opinion but I think 6 releases a year is already enough. In any case, there needs to be a hard limit to the number of releases a year and someone that has the authority to say no, otherwise my experience with these things is that everyone wants to have a go and if nobody says no, that's how these buttport labels with a new release every week happen. In that sense vinyl has the obvious advantage that there's a hard limit to many you can pump out and if there's money on the line, people will take quality control more seriously.
Maybe tapes? Not a huge financial investment and can be made in small numbers and on demand if there's need for more. I think they'd also be cool because they signal that it's not a DJ-tool label, probably resulting in less standard techno submission and more variety.
Quality control is quality control, having disposable cash to press vinyl means nothing in quality control terms. Plenty of shit on vinyl out there.
The label won`t be open submission, it will be for the community only, so I don`t think we have to worry about submission variety, I personally don`t think it should be DJ Tool releases in any way whatsoever, there is no longevity in tools, they are treated like junk food.
- Lost to the Void
- subsekt
- Posts: 13520
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 1:31 pm
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
I¬m going to clean up this forum a bit, non label discussion is distracting, and this is important, don`t need derails in here, want to get this all ground out so we can get going on it.
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Agree with the no remixes policy. Remixes suck. Always.
-
- reverse genius
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 3:03 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
With regards to formats, as a potential punter - I genuinely love vinyl, but I buy stuff on it pretty infrequently as it's silly expensive. Stuff on Bandcamp though I'm pretty carefree with. I'd be likely to buy every (digital) release on Bandcamp, on vinyl maybe not. Doubt I'm the only one. Not saying don't ever put a record out, but am saying it's not necessary. Physical stuff can be cool though, someone mentioned USB sticks and t-shirts, definitely of interest, but I'd suggest checking out Axis records where they do cool stuff like tire irons (joke). But seriously, maybe small amounts of limited stuff available for each release, but change what the 'stuff' is every time to keep it interesting.
- Lost to the Void
- subsekt
- Posts: 13520
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 1:31 pm
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Yeah as long as it's a good artistic addition and not a cash grab we can do shirts or nice art prints or whatever.
Initially I think release digitally regardless, if physical ends up being a destination I think work up to it after establishing the label.
Playing with different formats could be fun.
I've actually been enjoying doing mastering work for cassette, you can get a great sound out of it, if you work with an amenable plant who are willing to drive the levels to your spec.
We could also do 7inch stuff.
I mean really we need to know who wants to be involved.
Initially I think release digitally regardless, if physical ends up being a destination I think work up to it after establishing the label.
Playing with different formats could be fun.
I've actually been enjoying doing mastering work for cassette, you can get a great sound out of it, if you work with an amenable plant who are willing to drive the levels to your spec.
We could also do 7inch stuff.
I mean really we need to know who wants to be involved.
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
I could possibly help out with artwork.
Can upload some stuff and pm you a link.
Might be useful, might not. Either way, it'd be good to be able to contribute in some way ..
Can upload some stuff and pm you a link.
Might be useful, might not. Either way, it'd be good to be able to contribute in some way ..
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
We'll need artwork submissions, and a mixture of variety as well.
https://soundcloud.com/mslwte
https://noizefacilityrecords.bandcamp.com
https://www.instagram.com/subsekt909
https://www.facebook.com/subsekt909/
https://noizefacilityrecords.bandcamp.com
https://www.instagram.com/subsekt909
https://www.facebook.com/subsekt909/
Lost to the Void wrote:Fuck off, get some tequila down ya neck and make some noise you cunt....
- jordanneke
- subsekt
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:16 pm
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
This really sounds like a great project.
I'm more than happy to devote some time to help (and cash), but I'm afraid my skills maybe limited at best.
I think that people with the most objective and experienced ears should be the quality control ie our resident professionals.. Not something that everyone has a say in.
I'm more than happy to devote some time to help (and cash), but I'm afraid my skills maybe limited at best.
I think that people with the most objective and experienced ears should be the quality control ie our resident professionals.. Not something that everyone has a say in.
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Agreed. I think lots of people want to participate but you folk with the label running experience need to list out stuff we commoners could do so we all know who does what. If there even is work for 50+ people to start a labeljordanneke wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:45 amThis really sounds like a great project.
I'm more than happy to devote some time to help (and cash), but I'm afraid my skills maybe limited at best.
I think that people with the most objective and experienced ears should be the quality control ie our resident professionals.. Not something that everyone has a say in.
"After silence that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music". Aldous Huxley
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
dont know if i can help but im happy to spend some time on it
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Lots of positivity & good ideas in here Guys. Great to see real talk from mature people.
This will be good.
This will be good.
>> Click here for NEW POSTS on subsekt <<KennethExack wrote:My kids and I are completely shocked by the specialized secrets that everyone has on this forum
Dialog I The Hole I subsekt Blog I The Bench I IG I SC I Mixes I FB
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
It would actually be a very positive thing to get away from the current negativism about most music that’s released nowadays by doing this.
I'm sure it will be executed properly with the current vibe on this forum.
Quality output without the strategy to earn money. It's just what music is all about.
It will be a good no nonsense, 100% about the music label… .
I'm sure it will be executed properly with the current vibe on this forum.
Quality output without the strategy to earn money. It's just what music is all about.
It will be a good no nonsense, 100% about the music label… .
Re: Subsekt: The Label -- The Discussion
Full support! And if I can be a helping hand in any ways, then I would love to <3