go into arrangement!
- phlek
- Exampleless
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:35 pm
- Location: The Dales, North Yorkshire, UK
Re: go into arrangement!
I usually use the subtractive method if I get that far, although I've just added a nanoKONTROL2 and nanoPAD2 to my little setup so I can do some jamming and see what happens, hopefully it will help me past the stage of creating endless amounts of loops
Re: go into arrangement!
I've just got a Nanokontrol 2. Really like it. Decent enough for what it is like.
>> Click here for NEW POSTS on subsekt <<KennethExack wrote:My kids and I are completely shocked by the specialized secrets that everyone has on this forum
Dialog I The Hole I subsekt Blog I The Bench I IG I SC I Mixes I FB
- phlek
- Exampleless
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:35 pm
- Location: The Dales, North Yorkshire, UK
Re: go into arrangement!
Yep I agree, cheap and cheerful but does the job, just having the transport and channel controls is so much better
Re: go into arrangement!
mind-blowing reading all posts, inspiring if not.. !! alot of methods and ways of doin the magic i gonna go into for shore,! thanks a lot...
- 1nfinitezer0
- Tiesto
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:04 pm
- Location: canada
- Contact:
Re: go into arrangement!
I've got a beef with subtractive arrangement. It's definitely an easy way to structure a track, and cures the ails of getting stuck in loops, but I feel like it's part of the reason we see so much formulaic stuff.
I can't say I'm immune, as I use it about half the time for speed. For those who use it regularly, how do you approach subtractive arrangement so that it doesn't become stale and predictable? I'm thinking I need to start dragging things back from arrangement into session to re-jam them out...
I can't say I'm immune, as I use it about half the time for speed. For those who use it regularly, how do you approach subtractive arrangement so that it doesn't become stale and predictable? I'm thinking I need to start dragging things back from arrangement into session to re-jam them out...
Re: go into arrangement!
1nfinitezer0 wrote: For those who use it regularly, how do you approach subtractive arrangement so that it doesn't become stale and predictable?
just use it as a starting point and work a lot further from there.
Like a scetch in a scetch book.
be critical each time you listen, if it's too predictable, change it.
I usually make an arrangment by jamming with my APC40 from the session view and recording it into arrangment, and from that arrangment I work further fine-tuning automation and little errors here and there.
Sin cambios no hay mariposa
Re: go into arrangement!
With coke and jedi-force.1nfinitezer0 wrote:For those who use it regularly, how do you approach subtractive arrangement so that it doesn't become stale and predictable?
-
- pregnant
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:47 am
- Location: Montreal
Re: go into arrangement!
this.Mono-xID wrote:With coke and jedi-force.1nfinitezer0 wrote:For those who use it regularly, how do you approach subtractive arrangement so that it doesn't become stale and predictable?
Re: go into arrangement!
Midi-chlorians.Hades wrote:where can you get this jedi-force
Now where did I put my coat...?
-
- pregnant
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:47 am
- Location: Montreal
Re: go into arrangement!
from cokeHades wrote:where can you get this jedi-force
Re: go into arrangement!
there I was thinking all these years that was just your own blown up egoLaurentOrchard wrote:from cokeHades wrote:where can you get this jedi-force
Sin cambios no hay mariposa